WHO WE ARE
PURPOSE OF IPRsTrust.org
SUBSCRIPTION
CONTACT
COPYRIGHT & LIABILITY
:
Main Menu
Main menu
Ressources
Academic documents
Law Documents
Standards
3G
SDRAM
Cases
Broadcom vs Qualcomm
Dell
Negotiated Data Solutions
Rambus
Unocal
IPR policies of SSOs
ETSI
IEEE
VITA
Jurisdictions
European Union
Japan
United States
Basics & FAQ
Teaching materials
Events
Home
3G
Chinese experience with global 3G standard setting
Author:
Whalley, John & al.
Date:
2009
Download
Working paper
3G
Academic documents doc
Evolving Technologies and Standards Regulation
Author:
Cabral, Luis and David Salant
Date:
2008
Download
Working paper
2G
3G
CDMA
EVDO/CDMA2000
GSM
UMTS
WCDMA
ETSI
ITU
Academic documents doc
The structure and the evolution of essential patents for standards: Lessons from three IT standards, IIR Working Paper WP06-08
Author:
Nagaoka, Sadao, Shimbo Tomoyuki and Naotoshi Tsukada
Date:
2006
Download
Working paper
3G
DVD
MPEG2
WCDMA
ETSI
Patent fragmentation
Strategic patenting
3G doc
Academic documents doc
Patent Holdup and Royalty Stacking, 85 Texas Law Review 1991
Author:
Lemley, Mark A. and Carl Shapiro
Date:
2007
Download
Published article
3G
EVDO/CDMA2000
WCDMA
WI-FI
ETSI
IEEE
Double marginalization/multiple marginalization/royalty stacking
Ex ante negotiations/competition
Hold-up
Injunction
Market power (IP holders)
RAND/FRAND
Georgia-Pacific v. United States Plywood
In the Matter of Rambus, Inc.
Academic documents doc
Technology standards, Patents and Antitrust, forthcoming in COmpetition and Regulation in Newtork Industries
Author:
Lévêque, Francois and Yann Ménière
Date:
2007
Download
Published article
3G
DVD
MPEG2
SDRAM
VL-BUS
WCDMA
Broadcom
Dell
Nokia
Qualcomm
Rambus
JEDEC
ETSI
VITA
Deceptive conduct
Disclosure
Discrimination
Double marginalization/multiple marginalization/royalty stacking
Essential/essentiality [of patent?]
Ex ante auction
Ex ante negotiations/competition
Hold-out
Hold-up
Market power (IP holders)
Patent ambush/ambush
Patent pool
RAND/FRAND
Abuse of dominant position/Article 82
Article 82
Collusion/Cartel
Foreclosure
Sherman Act Section 2
European Commission
FTC
EU
USA
Academic documents doc
Broadcom Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc, D.N.J.
Date:
August 31, 2006
Download
Court decision
2G
3G
4G
CDMA
UMTS
WCDMA
Broadcom
Qualcomm
ITU
Deceptive conduct
Disclosure
Essential/essentiality [of patent?]
Market power (IP holders)
RAND/FRAND
Sherman Act Section 1
Sherman Act Section 2
USA
Broadcom v. Qualcomm (Antitrust)
Law document doc
Qualcomm Broadcomm doc
Motion to dismiss by Qualcomm Inc.
Brief of party
2G
3G
4G
CDMA
UMTS
WCDMA
Broadcom
Qualcomm
ITU
ITU
Deceptive conduct
Disclosure
Essential/essentiality [of patent?]
Market power (IP holders)
RAND/FRAND
Sherman Act Section 1
Sherman Act Section 2
USA
Broadcom v. Qualcomm (Antitrust)
Law document doc
Qualcomm Broadcomm doc
Motion to Dismiss by Qualcomm Inc., Brief in support
Brief of party
3G
4G
CDMA
UMTS
WCDMA
Broadcom
Qualcomm
ITU
ITU
Deceptive conduct
Disclosure
Essential/essentiality [of patent?]
Market power (IP holders)
RAND/FRAND
Sherman Act Section 1
Sherman Act Section 2
USA
Broadcom v. Qualcomm (Antitrust)
Law document doc
Qualcomm Broadcomm doc
Memorandum Opinion
Brief of party
2G
3G
4G
CDMA
UMTS
WCDMA
Broadcom
Qualcomm
ITU
ITU
Deceptive conduct
Disclosure
Essential/essentiality [of patent?]
Market power (IP holders)
RAND/FRAND
Sherman Act Section 1
Sherman Act Section 2
USA
Broadcom v. Qualcomm (Antitrust)
Law document doc
Qualcomm Broadcomm doc
Broadcom Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc, 3rd Cir.(N.J.)
Date:
September 4, 2007
Download
Court decision
3G
4G
Broadcom
Qualcomm
ITU
ITU
Deceptive conduct
Disclosure
Essential/essentiality [of patent?]
Market power (IP holders)
RAND/FRAND
Sherman Act Section 1
Sherman Act Section 2
USA
Broadcom v. Qualcomm (Antitrust)
Law document doc
Qualcomm Broadcomm doc
1
2
next ›
last »
